Pages

Monday, November 25, 2013

Here Comes "The Rescue"


Last week the LDS Church posted a long overdue essay regarding the various account of the First Vision on its website.   Awesome.  I applaud the Church for finally coming out and addressing the questions directly.   Can members and non-members alike talk about these issues civilly now?  

To what has been known to LDS scholars since at least the 1960’s and to increasing numbers of disaffected LDS since the advent of the internet, the Church finally lent its voice to the topic of the various conflicting accounts of Joseph Smith’s First Vision.   The Church even directly addresses the problematic 1832 account dictated by Joseph Smith himself 6 years before the version with which all LDS are familiar and can practically recite from memory.  

That 1832 account gives the strong impression that only one heavenly personage appeared in the grove to Joseph Smith.   It also shows the First Vision to be a quest seeking forgiveness rather than the clarion call to discover which of all the Churches on the earth were true.  Many critics have latched on to this particular account.
      
My post is not to going delve into the details of that debate.   That debate has gone on for years.   But that debate usually took place outside the eyes and ears of your average active LDS member of the Church.   Apologists and critics argued back and forth for years.  That debate intensified with the advent of the internet as the details became more accessible to the average member, with pro and anti Mormon blogs and websites (and every range of thought in between) discussing the details.  Yet, during that entire time, the Church remained officially silent. 
 
Apologist sites like FAIR and the Neal A. Maxwell institute, or other more personal apologist websites such as Jeff Lindsey and others could never speak on behalf of the Church.  It was their opinions and they said so, never pretending to be more than what they were…faithful members providing faith promoting interpretations to difficult questions.   But they could not represent the Church.  No one really knew what the official Church position was.  

But something big has happened.   Around the time of the advent of the internet, the growth of the Church slowed tremendously.  From the Church’s own statistics provided at General Conference one can see that growth has been stalled at an average of 2.5% annually since 2000.   Significantly down from the 3.9% annual growth of the 1990’s, or the 5.3% annual growth of the 1980’s.

Despite increasing numbers of missionaries, baptisms have been stuck in the 250k-300K range for years.   Missionaries of today are averaging far fewer baptisms per missionary than their counterparts of the 1990’s and the 1980’s.  

Even more troubling was the increasing numbers of devout members that were leaving the Church.  They were not just going inactive, but officially requesting to have their names removed from the records of the Church. I would venture to say that most members are now are aware of at least one previously devout member who has left the Church.   Despite 15 million members of the Church on the record books, it is estimated that only about 5 million of them are active.  

One can tell that members of the Church are subtly feeling this challenge if not yet quite openly recognizing it.   The number of general conference talks aimed at members who are doubting their testimonies has increased.   Currently devout members reflecting  this unspoken feeling have seized upon Pres. Uchtdorf’s talk at the last general conference encouraging members to “doubt their doubts, before they doubt their faith.”  They have covered Facebook and other social media with posts and blogs related to that quote.

In addition, it has been more and more evident that active members are willing to be very visible in taking stands often in opposition to the Church’s own positions for greater integration of women, or gay marriage, or any number of other issues.

There is tremendous anecdotal evidence of this challenge to growth the Church has been experiencing for years but nothing official to confirm it.  Every General Conference talk or those given by local leaders was the same positive outlook.  “All is well”  “The Church is growing like never before!”

Until in November of 2011 when Marlin K. Jensen, an LDS General Authority and the LDS Church Historian was speaking to a group hosted by the John A. Widstoe Association for Mormon Studies at Utah State University.   During his comments he acknowledged the reality of the challenge the Church was facing.   He stated that “Maybe since Kirtland, we have never had a period of, I’ll call it apostasy, like we’re having right now.”    

His comments were seized upon and set the LDS blogosphere on fire with discussion.   There it was.  An official of the Church acknowledging an ongoing “apostasy” of significant proportion.  Enough to have the leaders of the Church seriously concerned, addressing the issue in General Conference, and considering other courses of action.  

So, the Church has been attempting to make changes to address the many issues seen as contributing to the ongoing apostasy.   Any faithful Latter Day Saint will note that there have been many changes and new efforts.   The change in the Youth Sunday School Curriculum, the publishing of the Joseph Smith Papers, the change in missionary age, and so on.   It has been noted that Church officials were doing what they could to stem the tide of devout members who were leaving the flock.   Those efforts were going to be called “The Rescue.” 
 
Recently, rumors were running around the LDS blogosphere that the LDS Church as a part of that "Rescue" were going to do more to address the growing number of devout members who have chosen to leave the Church. Specifically several essays were going to be released by the Church discussing difficult questions that have been mentioned by many who have left the Church.   Questions regarding the First Vision, Joseph’s polyandry (marriages to women already married), and the translation of the Book of Abraham that does not match the papyrus are just a few of the issues that are being speculated about that the Church might address. 
      
Last week the first of those essays was posted confirming those rumors.   Here Comes "The Rescue"!

The page providing the official Church explanation of apparently contradictory First Vision accounts was posted last week.   I applaud the Church for finally tackling the fact that there have been multiple and apparently contradictory accounts of the First Vision head on with an official voice.  Some members may be unaware of the many different and contradictory accounts and not care that they exist.   For others this is just noise and not important since they have their testimony.    Others may find it an interesting jaunt through history. But for some of the previously devout, this has been just one of many issues that concerned them.  

Some of them ran into painful walls as they wrestled with that and many other questions. They turned to their LDS leaders, family and friends.   But, LDS leaders, family, and friends called these facts that they had learned “lies” spread by anti-mormons.   Some of them were told to ignore it, or to put it up on their mental shelf (or in their mental boxes) and forget about them.  Some LDS leaders, family and friends refused to discuss them.  Some were told that they were being influenced by Satan.  Others were accused of attempting to weaken the testimony of others.  Spouses threatened divorce for daring to question the Church..  Some were even reported on to their local church authorities who then put them on watch, putting them under surveillance watching anything they might say or write about the Church clearly watching for outright apostasy.   All this buffeting by some local LDS leaders, family and friends for daring even to attempt to understand and ask questions about it in a sincere quest for truth left many of the previously devout feeling betrayed and angry. 

The Church remaining silent allowed this to happen.   Those asking the questions knew the Church was aware of the problems.  They found Church sources confirming the facts that were creating the questions and debates.  They found comments by General Authorities including Apostles showing clearly that the CHurch leadership was aware of the specific issues.   Yet the Church remained officially silent.   They found BYU scholars acknowledging that there were issues requiring explanation.   Yet the Church remained silent.  

And so without any Church acknowledgement, some of these previously devout members were left to be buffeted by the average LDS member who was simply not aware.   And why were they not aware?  Because Church correlation focused only on the uplifting and avoided the troubling issues.   Church direction for doctrinal instruction was to focus on milk before meat.   Church direction was to avoid doubt at all costs.   Doubting was subconsciously elevated to the rank of sin.   So in part, some of these members feel betrayed by the Church as well.

Too long have these issues sat in the obscure realms of scholarly debate and the LDS blogosphere.     Well, the Church is silent no more.  “The Rescue” efforts have begun.   The Church has finally, openly and officially acknowledged one set of issues that has troubled many of those who have left and many who are still active LDS.   It is not my intent with this blog post to argue for one side or the other of the essay related to the First Vision posted by the Church.

Rather, it is my hope, that with the Church’s publishing of their essay on the First Vision.   With the continued publishing of other issues on topics troubling many members, that there will be less attacks on those who ask questions.   That members will not be afraid to ask questions about issues that might concern them and fear the buffetings of LDS leaders, family and friends.  That the invisible wall of fear around dealing with these issues will come crumbling down.  

Truth will withstand scrutiny!  We should not fear truth!  Oh say what is truth? ‘Tis the fairest gem.   That is all any of us seek.   May we all be able to seek it together in the Spirit that Christ intended.  One with real intent, a sincere heart, and full of pure charity for all.  I think the ability to have those discussions openly and without recrimination will go a much longer way towards stemming the tide of apostasy that the Church is experiencing than the previous policy of remaining silent and allowing local LDS leaders, family, and friends attempt to stop the questioning with various methods that isolated the questioner.   They hoped to get the questioner to ignore what they simply could not.  

“Doubt your doubts” does NOT translate into ignoring your doubts.   It means to consider those doubts questionable and not take them at face value.   It is a challenge to investigate those doubts more to find out the real truth.   And the challenge to find the truth is quite simply the challenge that Mormons are giving the world.  


So here comes “The Rescue”!  Rumor has it that other essays will be forthcoming from the Church.  Other troubling topics to finally be officially acknowledged and addressed.   For too long the Church has remained silent.   The lower lights were not burning.  No beams were being cast along the rough seas.  Many a poor and fainting seaman were buffeted mercilessly by the seas of their loved ones and did not make it to the LDS shore.   Perhaps, now that the Church has begun to turn those lower lights on… some of those seamen might be rescued and might be saved.   

~ Bruce Fey

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Non Mormon Latter Day Saints


About a week and a half ago, I met two Latter Day Saints.   The one difference though, is that these two people are not Mormon.   I had the opportunity to meet Tommy and Gina.   They are a couple from a different faith who about a year ago started going out into the streets of Fort Wayne on Friday nights to visit the homeless. A couple of weeks ago, my wife and I went out with them and a few others to minister to the homeless of Fort Wayne.
Gina and Tommy have done this every single Friday night.   They bring the homeless food which has been donated by many people and local restaurant owners.   They bring them clothing, blankets, and back packs…all donated by people who know Gina and Tommy and what they do.   Gina and Tommy meet at a downtown McDonald’s every Friday night.  They are joined by people from a variety of faiths who come to help.   My wife and I, two Mormons, joined them one night.   They head to parks where they know the homeless spend the night.  They head to the Rescue Mission to visit with those seeking food, clothing and shelter there.   They go underneath bridges and seek out those who find shelter for the night there.  

They not only bring food, clothing and other needs, they bring hope and the peace of Christ.   Gina and Tommy truly love these people.  They have taken time to get to know them and their stories.  The personal, emotional, and spiritual nourishment that they bring is just as important as the warm soup, oranges, back packs and clean socks they hand out (among many other things).   They listen, they share stories.  They laugh together and cry together.   Then when it is time to move to the next location, we gather in a circle with the homeless and offer a prayer for them before leaving.          
I was amazed as I watched Tommy and Gina share of themselves with the homeless.   The homeless love them back.   When Jana and I were walking around the park to tell people that we had arrived with supplies, one homeless man was reticent.  He did not want to take handouts.  He felt bad that people felt that they had to give up of their things for him.   I was moved by his words.  He just sat there, with his head bowed, not looking directly at us.   But when we told him that Tommy and Gina were there, his face lit up.   He immediately got up to go and see them. It was not the offer of food or clothing that moved him, it was love of another.  

Another homeless man spent a lot of time talking with me.  He was a grizzled old veteran of the streets.   He looked me in the eye and told me quite sincerely that “God will never give you a burden that you cannot handle.”   He later pointed to Tommy and Gina saying that they were the reason that he could handle his burden.  He felt God’s love directly from them. They were an answer to his prayers. And yes, he does pray.  
I will let you read Gina’s own account of that night we spent truly ministering to the homeless that Jana and I spent with her, her husband Tommy, and three others from two different faiths.

“Well everyone it was chilly but not freezing this week and for that we are thankful!!! As we went to McDonalds we did not see Mike again ..... we miss seeing him and pray that he is doing ok. Saw some regulars who go in and have some hot coffee and get out of the cold for awhile. We saw Curtis there who always makes our day with his wit and smiles!!! We talked about his week and how he has been feeling. 
WE also had an interesting thing happen at McDonald’s this week.  Went up to get a coffee for one our friends and the young girl working behind the counter says, “You read the Bible right?”  I said “yes” Well she said that she has been recently reading the Bible and had a few questions and wanted to know if I could answer them.  RIGHT THEN!!! She proceeded to ask some pretty good questions and yet hard in a way and many ears were listening as one of the questions could have been uncomfortable – mainly for me in giving the answer.  One of the workers there was also trying to answer and it got for a second a little uncomfortable which left me thinking “Ok, here I am getting a coffee and getting ready to leave and go feed the homeless and yet here I have this moment where I am caught was OFF GUARD and yet this is what it is all about – so Holy Spirit please enable me right now to answer correctly and precise and quickly”   because I knew she wanted quick answers but truthful ones as she was also trying to work.  So she asked 3 hard questions and the Spirit showed up and answered them and she seemed content with them.  It was again another reminder of how the scripture talks about how we are able to give an answer of hope that is within us.  We need to know the word of God and yet be willing to allow God to use us in a quick unexpected moment and I learned that again!!!  When we say yes to our Father in Heaven as a follower of Christ,  He will use us however He wants and whenever He wants and we need to be willing and be prepared….it was a good reminder for me to keep faithful and keep studying the word and know it and rely on the power of the Spirit every minute.   One man asked us to pray for his father as we were getting ready to leave in the parking lot of the McDonald’s.   Curtis also joined us and we prayed for his health and he seemed to be emotional which got us emotional and it was again another reminder that while we laugh and joke each week and visit, there is a need deep within each person for friendship, for community, and for consistency.

As we made our way to the park we were SO excited to see one of our friends who comes each week.  He is not homeless, but is someone who needs help.  He never asks for anything, just always comes and hangs out.  Recently, about a couple of weeks in a row when asked if we could bring him anything he said “How about a heater!”  Well, we told him that we didn’t have one, but this week was different.   We got a call from Lynn and Mark Stebing that said they had two space heaters and wanted to know if we wanted them FOR FREE!!! To that we said YES!!! So this week as we pulled in I cannot tell you how thrilled we were to hand him that heater!!! WOW!!! He said that his house is always at 59 degrees and he has not been able to get the heat fixed – no worries now!!  We later took the heater to his house as he was unable to carry it on his bike home – Thanks Mark and Lynn!!!
We also got to talk to our friend who rode the bus down to see us.  It is nice to know that he is no longer living in a tent and is able to stay warm.  We were in need of some food though so we gave him oranges and canned good for which he was very thankful.  

Saw one man who we haven’t seen in a while. He talked about how he used to have a job, and a house until his job shut down and then he couldn’t afford his house and from there it crumbled.   He looked at it positively and said that he has no stresses from paying bills etc.  He has such a great way about him, and yet living outside we all know would not be easy, and yet he doesn’t complain.  He works when he can find it and again never asks for anything (but we always make sure he has what he needs!) 
Saw Dan who was not feeling well as he has epilepsyeling. We also talked with a few other guys about a bunch of odds and ends. Also had a interesting thing happen at McDonalds this week. Went up to get a coffee for one of our friends and the young girl working behind the counter says "You read the Bible right?" I said yes .... well she said that she has been recently reading the Bible and had a few questions and wanted to know if I could answer them.... RIGHT THEN!!! She proceeded to ask some pretty good questions and yet hard in a way and many ears were a listening as one of the questions could have been uncomfortable- mainly for me in giving the answer. One of the workers there was also trying to answer and it got for a second a little uncomfortable which left me thinking "Ok, here Iam getting a coffee and getting ready to leave and go feed and yet here I have this moment where Iam caught way OFF GUARD and yet this is what it is all about - so Holy Spirit please enable me right now to answer correctly and precise and quickly" because I knew she wanted quick answers but truthful ones as she was also trying to work. So she asked 3 hard questions and the Holy Spirit showed up and answered them and she seemed content with them. It was again another reminder of how the Bible talks about how we are to be able to give an answer of the hope that is within us- . We need to know the word of God and yet be willing to allow God to use us in a quick unexpected moment and I learned that again!!! When we say yes to God just as a Christ follower He will use us however He wants whenever He wants and we need to be willing and be prepared .... good reminder for me to stay in my word and study and know it and rely on the power of the Holy Spirit every minute. One man asked us to pray for his father as we were getting ready to leave McDonalds in the parking lot and we said yes-Curtis also joined us and we prayed for his health and he seemed to be emotional which got us emotional and it was again another reminder that while we laugh and joke each week and visit there is a need deep within each person for friendship, for community and for consistency. eling. We also talked with a few other guys about a bunch of odds and ends. Also had a interesting thing happen at McDonalds this week. Went up to get a coffee for one of our friends and the young girl working behind the counter says "You read the Bible right?" I said yes .... well she said that she has been recently reading the Bible and had a few questions and wanted to know if I could answer them.... RIGHT THEN!!! She proceeded to ask some pretty good questions and yet hard in a way and many ears were a listening as one of the questions could have been uncomfortable- mainly for me in giving the answer. One of the workers there was also trying to answer and it got for a second a little uncomfortable which left me thinking "Ok, here Iam getting a coffee and getting ready to leave and go feed and yet here I have this moment where Iam caught way OFF GUARD and yet this is what it is all about - so Holy Spirit please enable me right now to answer correctly and precise and quickly" because I knew she wanted quick answers but truthful ones as she was also trying to work. So she asked 3 hard questions and the Holy Spirit showed up and answered them and she seemed content with them. It was again another reminder of how the Bible talks about how we are to be able to give an answer of the hope that is within us- . We need to know the word of God and yet be willing to allow God to use us in a quick unexpected moment and I learned that again!!! When we say yes to God just as a Christ follower He will use us however He wants whenever He wants and we need to be willing and be prepared .... good reminder for me to stay in my word and study and know it and rely on the power of the Holy Spirit every minute. One man asked us to pray for his father as we were getting ready to leave McDonalds in the parking lot and we said yes-Curtis also joined us and we prayed for his health and he seemed to be emotional which got us emotional and it was again another reminder that while we laugh and joke each week and visit there is a need deep within each person for friendship, for community and for consistency.

As we made our way to the park we were SO excited to see one of our friends who comes each week. He is not homeless but again needs help- he never asks for anything just always comes and hangs out. A couple weeks in a row when asked if we could bring him anything he said "How about a heater!" well we told him we didnt have one.... but this week was different. We got a call from Lynn and Mark Stebing that said they had two space heaters and wanted to know if we wanted them FOR FREE!!! To that we said YES!!!! So this week as we pulled in I cannot tell you how thrilled we were to hand him that heater!!! WOW!!!! He said his house is always at 59 degrees and he has not been able to get the heat fixed- no worries now!!! We later took the heater to his house as he was unable to carry it on his bike home - thanks Mark and Lynn!!!! We also got to talk to our friend who rode the bus down to see us- its nice to know he is not living out in a tent anymore and is able to stay warm. He was in need of some food though so we gave him some oranges and canned goods to which he was very thankful. Saw one man who we havent seen in awhile. He talked about how he used to have a job, and a house untill his job shut down and then he couldnt afford his house and from there it crumbled. He now though said that he has no stresses of paying bills etc.... he has such a great way about him and yet living outside we all know would not be easy and yet he doesnt complain, he works when he can find it and again never asks for anything (but we always make sure he has what he needs!) Saw Dan who was not feeling well has he has epilepsy. He was struggling and didnt stay long- just long enough to get a back pack and a few things and he went home. We went later on to check on him as we ended the night and dropped off a sleeping bag and a blanket and he was at least safe for the night. We ended the night by praying again for needs and being thankful for another and the friendships that have taken place- We then took two guys home to where they are staying and said "See ya next week!!"

Headed to the mission next and it was nice to not have to go in as the weather was tolerable to be outside. We saw our friend who comes to church with us. He talked about how he now has the freedom to get his own place and what his plans are. He talked about being able to go home and its been great getting to know him and were thankful for his friendship. Talked with our friend who we told you had to get a mri on his back- he is going to the surgeon this week to discuss back surgery- were hoping that while surgery is a hard thing that it will keep him out of a wheelchair!! Talked with the man who we've been sharing about that is 20 and has had a rough past and doesnt believe in God. We asked how the young girl has been doing that he asked us to pray for and he said she actually has been doing better and possibly things may be looking up in her home situation which is great to hear. We gave him a book entitled "Can God be trusted?" As we gave it to him he just laughed and we asked if he would at least try to read it and he said that he would try!!! So well see :) We also had another young man express that based on his past decisions does not feel he would be forgiven and go to heaven which is very hard to hear. He was told though of many examples of people in the Bible who also had made some bad decisions and yet God used them and put their stories in the Bible. He was told how to accept Christ and he walked away saying that he had some thinking to do on it and so we will keep him in our prayers as well. This week our friend Steve said that we should pray outside and so we did. We had a man say that he has been sober for 107 days and how hard that road has been, one man asked for prayer to stay on the right path, some needed jobs, some housing, many just HOPE, many needing PEACE, .... we again let them know how to accept Christ for after we leave we never know what needed to be said that wasent and so we dont want to leave without explaining how to know Christ!!

We then headed to the bridge and for me as I said last week thats where I finally get to "sit on the couch" and relax. One friend said that I couldnt turn on the tv though hahaha!!! So there we sat and talked. One of our friends talked about his week and how he had a seizure and yet he remains in such good spirits. Our other friend joined us in talking about raising kids and oh how crazy it is at times. We talked about some guys who also stay under the bridge and their circumstances , guys who have come and gone and just life. We were again happy to give them oranges and they were happy to get them (thanks Karen)... again not really asking for anything- except a 9 volt battery to which we gave him 2!!! We prayed as we left for them and said "thanks for letting us sit on your couch, be safe and we will see you next week!"

So all in all it was a great night and we were again asked "how do you get all the stuff you bring?" and we explained it them... word of mouth, facebook, churches etc... and again they were amazed and so are we. We are amazed each week at what we have to offer because of everyones help. Thanks so much. Its a great feeling when someone says do you have this or that and we can say YES we do!! I heard a man say when I was getting some body spray out for him that we always have everything!!!! (by the way we need more body spray :)!! So some people to thank....... Bev and Cliff Gunnion, Joanne Emerick, Karen Slabaugh, Lori Wisel, Bethel United Church, Bill Sobieski, Diane Geeting, Mark and Lynn Stebing, Auburn Massage Center, Sarah Lapadot, MJS Apparel, Sheila, Todd Plympton, Jana and Bruce Fey, Julie, For whoever dropped off stuff at MJS and Auburn Massage Center, Pathway Community Church and we need to remember to always thank our God for His blessing, for His provision, for our health, for the work of the cross and for His love for us and how He always meets our needs. As we talked at the mission God may not do things according to OUR timetable but He is NEVER LATE and He does prove again how faithful HE is , that He can be trusted, thats its always all about Him!!! Thanks everyone and please please look through your closets and let us know if you have anything your not needing because what you dont need someone else may!! Thanks and God bless..... quick note here: Some may wonder why some names are mentioned and some are not.... the ones that are are because we have permssion to use their names, their stories. Many have said "use my name, use my story I dont care!" So while this isnt about invading peoples privacy we do like to share those that we can so you can keep up with those who need your prayers and get to know some of our friends!!! Thanks
.  He was struggling and didn’t stay long – just long enough to get a back pack from us and a few other things and went back out into the night.   We ended the night with them by praying again for needs and being thankful for another and the friendships that have taken place.  We then took two guys to the locations they are staying and said “See ya next week!!”

We headed to the Rescue Mission next and it was nice to not have to go inside as the weather was just tolerable enough to be outside.  Talked with the man who we’ve been sharing about that is 20 and has had a rough past and doesn’t believe in God.   We asked how the young girl has been doing that he asked us to pray for and he said that she has actually been doing better and possibly things may be looking up in her home situation which is great to hear.  We gave him a book entitled “Can God be Trusted?”  As we gave it to him, he just laughed and we asked if he would at least try to read it and he said that he would try!! So we’ll see J  We also had another young man express that based on his past decisions, he does not feel that he would be forgiven and go to heaven which is very hard to hear.  He was told though of many examples of people in the Bible who also had made some bad decisions and yet God used them and put their stories in the Bible.  We encouraged him to follow Christ and he walked away saying that he had some thinking to do on it and so we will keep him in our prayers as well.   This week our friend Steve suggested that we pray outside and so we did.  WE had a man share that he had been sober for 107 days.  and how hard that road has been, one man asked for prayer to stay on the right path, some needed jobs, some housing, many just HOPE, many needing PEACE, .... we again let them know how to accept Christ for after we leave we never know what needed to be said that wasent and so we dont want to leave without explaining how to know Christ!!And how hard that road has been, one man asked for prayer to stay on the right path, some needed jobs, some housing, many just HOPE, many needing PEACE,…we again let them know to follow Christ for after we leave we never know what needed to be said that wasn’t and so we don’t want to leave without explaining how to know Christ!!
We then headed to the bridge and for me as I said last week, that’s where I finally get to “sit on the couch” [a bunch of rocks under the bridge covered by a sleeping bag] and relax.  One friend said that I couldn’t turn on the tv though hahaha!! So there we sat and talked.  One of our friends talked about his week and how he had a seizure and yet he remains in such good spirits.  Our other friend joined us in talking about raising kids and oh how crazy it is at times.  We talked about some other guys who also stay under the bridge and their circumstances, guys who have come and gone and just life.  We were happy again to give them oranges and they were happy to get them (thanks Karen)..again not really asking for anything except a 9 volt battery to which we gave him 2!! We prayed as we left for them and said, “thanks for letting us sit on your couch, be safe and we will see you next week!”

So all in all, it was a great night and we were again asked “how do you get all the stuff you bring? And we explained it them…word of mouth, facebook, churches, etc..and again they were amazed and so are we.  We are amazed each week at what we have to offer because of everyone’s help.  Thanks so much.  It’s a great feeling when someone say do you have this or that and we can say YES we do!! I head a man say when I was getting some body spray out for him that we always have everything!!!! (by the way we need more body sprayJ!! So some people to thank…Bev and Cliff Gunnnion, Joanne Emerick, Karen Slabaugh, Lori Wisel, Bill Sobieski, Diane Geeting, Sarah Lapadot, Sheila, Todd Plympton, Jana and Bruce Fey, Julie, Bethel United Church, Auburn Massage Center, MJS Apparel, Pathway Community Church, and whoever dropped off stuff at MJS.  WE need to remember always to thank our God for His blessings, for His provision, for our health, for His work on the cross, and for His love for us and how He always meets our needs.   As we talked at the Rescue Mission, God may not do things according to our timetable but he is NEVER LATE and He does prove again how faithful HE is, that HE can be trusted.  Thanks everyone and please please look through your closets and let us know if you have anything you are not needing because what you don’t need someone else may!! Thanks and God bless…”
What wonderful people.   You don’t need to look up the definition of the word “Saint” to know that these two people are saints.   Yet, I looked it up anyways.   (it’s a mormon thing to look up definitions of words for use in sacrament meeting talks, blogs etc…)   Going back to the Greek and looking at how the word is used in the Bible, the word “saint” did not refer to sanctified deceased persons, but rather to living persons who had dedicated themselves to God.  Tommy and Gina have literally done that.   Different faiths have different takes and definitions of the word “Saint” but there are a few things they all share in common…

Across all faiths, Saints are
a.        Exemplary people and role models
b.      Extraordinary teachers
c.       Sources of great benevolence
d.      Often an intercessor for God

Gina and Tommy fit all of these characteristics.  And if someone wants to quibble with me about calling them an intercessor for God (and Gina and Tommy would probably be the first to do so!), if you talk to the homeless they will all point to Gina and Tommy as intercessors.  They have felt God’s love through them, they feel that God has answered many of their prayers through them, They have come to know Christ their Great Intercessor through them.  So yes, in a very real way, Gina and Tommy are Saints.  Just ask any homeless person in the streets of Fort Wayne.  Given that they are doing their work in these the Latter Days…that makes these two wonderful non-Mormons true Latter Day Saints.

~ Bruce Fey

The Feeling that Church History has been Whitewashed



Well, the holidays are over, the kids are back in school and the routine of life is back.   That also means picking up this blog up again.   However, I really struggled writing this particular blog on a number of different levels.   Lots of worries went through my head, and I even considered not posting at all. As a reminder, this particular blog post is part of a series where I am sharing what I learned in studying the stories of 158 once devout members who ended up choosing to leave the Church.   This would now be the 7thblog post in this series.  The first 5 posts served as an introduction, explaining my own life experiences that led to this study and my motivations to understand this ever growing group of once devout Latter Day Saints.   The sixth post just gave an overview of the results of that survey and what I learned about those 158.   Starting with this post and over the next few posts I will share some of the issues mentioned most often by them and ones that seemed to have the greatest impact on them.  
This post might be a hard one for some, so proceed with caution.  Please remember that what I am writing here are not my words, but the feelings that were shared by these once devout members who left the church.  There will be many feelings and thoughts that they shared that are critical of the Church, so be forewarned.  But if we don’t listen and try to understand their experiences how can we ever hope to address those concerns, be prepared when those concerns are raised perhaps by our fellow LDS friends, or avoid that path ourselves?  I think we would be kidding ourselves if we think this trend will eventually go away.

One of the reasons cited most often (61%) in the stories that I studied that were shared by the 158 once devout Mormons who eventually left the church dealt with Church history.  Especially what they learned about early church history and events directly related to the founding of the Church.   Despite being devout members who diligently read the scriptures, participated in Sunday School, and magnified their callings in some cases for decades, many of them were learning things about Church history that had never been mentioned and that in some cases were quite different than what they had been taught including some things that they felt directly contradicted what they had learned about Church history.
Many of them initially distrusted what they had learned; assuming it to be from some anti-Mormon source, but to their consternation would find them confirmed from LDS sources.  As they sought for understanding and answers to an ever increasing number of questions, they inevitably turned to FAIR, FARMS, Jeff Lindsay’s web site and other sources seeking for pro-LDS answers to the things they were learning.   Yet, what bothered them even more was to find out that all of these pro-LDS sources confirmed what they were learned and that LDS scholars had been debating and addressing them for years.   A whole world of unknown Church facts and history that were not necessarily faith promoting at first glance now opened up to them.

Yet, what was interesting about their stories is that the main thing that troubled them was not so much the fact that they were learning things that contradicted what they had been taught, but rather the question of WHY they did not know about these things before.  To many of them it felt that Church sincerely hoped that they would never learn about those facts or ignore them once they did.  It felt like many of the stories taught from their youth had left out many important details or they had been polished to such a sheen as to completely omit anything that might take away from the idealized understanding of our history.     
Yes, they were bothered by some of the things that they learned, but what was more important to them was that many of them mentioned feeling betrayed, or lied to.   Some became angry.   With each new fact that they learned, they wondered what else had they not been taught, what else had not been shared, what other inconvenient truth or uncomfortable fact was glossed over, ignored or omitted.   The facts did not bother them as much as the feeling of being lied to by an organization they trusted implicitly and to which they had given much of their lives and devotion.  Some felt that the Church had intentionally polished its history, whitewashing any of the blemishes and thus being dishonest about its own past.

Many of them had said that if the Church had been more open about its past and had provided some type of an explanation, that they might not have ever left.   Their words appear to be buttressed by one active LDS sister who commented that she “…was plainly taught many of these controversial issues by her family when she was growing up.  As a consequence, because of her complete knowledge of the historical problems of the LDS church, if any new disturbing information would come to light, it didn’t really affect her testimony.  
The feelings that the Church was whitewashing its history were only reinforced when in the course of their personal research they learned that prominent scholars have been disciplined with regards to their scholarship on the history of the church, the September Six back in 1993 being the most prominent examples and probably Grant Palmer being one of the more recent examples.   They observed that the in not one single case, was the work of these scholars challenged as untrue, but rather, they were punished because their works were laying bare uncomfortable truths about Church history that could cause one’s testimony to be challenged.  The “Truth” or the factual basis of what these scholars published was not the issue behind their discipline. 

Their negative reactions to their feelings that the Church was intentionally omitting what they felt were important parts of Church history were magnified because of the Church’s teachings regarding the pursuit of truth, honesty, integrity and honesty.   All those teachings had sunk deep into the hearts of these members, who then felt that they were finding instances of lack of integrity by the church in choosing not to be open about its past and only presenting the good while completely ignoring and even discouraging any discussion of anything that might not be so faith promoting.  Some of them even went so far as to accuse the church of hypocrisy on this point since the Church demands that its members be fully forthright about their personal lives in interviews with local Church authorities while the Church conspicuously avoids any discussion of the problematic aspects of its own past and has created a culture where members are trained to do the same.  
Many of them also pointed to comments by Elder Boyd K. Packer in his talk “The Mantle is far, far greater than the Intellect” (BYU Studies  Summer 1981) when he outright proclaims that “not all truths are useful.”  In this speech, Elder Packer directly encourages LDS scholars and teachers to focus only on Church history that is uplifting and faith promoting and to not give voice to the rest.   Given what they have learned so far, Elder Packer’s talk is interpreted by some of them as direct evidence that the Church is actively covering up the less faith promoting aspects of its history.   President Packer ends his talk with the injunction that teachers and scholars of Church history should endeavor to make sure members “see in every hour and in every moment of the existence of the Church..the overruling, almighty hand of God” while omitting anything that might not be faith promoting.

The situation of this member who has come across all of this “new” information and who feels that the Church intentionally avoids some parts of its history is then compounded even further when these questioning members run headlong into stiff resistance from fellow members of the Church after they begin to ask questions about what they have learned.  These still devout but questioning members turn to Priesthood leaders, the resident ward scholar, and fellow devout LDS friends and family to sincerely ask…”have you heard of this?   Is it true?   What do you think about it? How does that fit in?” They are turning to trusted people IN THE CHURCH for help on issues that are now troubling them, but are not as of yet strong enough to drive them from the Church.
The reaction that many of them in this group of 158 met from these trusted and devout LDS leaders and friends is sad.  The members that did not receive them critically typically responded in four ways: “I don’t know” , “Pray about it”, “Read the Book of Mormon” or “I’ve put it on a mental shelf and plan to ask God about it after I die.”  In other words, they had no answers, no explanation, and often just more questions.   Unfortunately, a significantly larger percentage of these devout members received a far more critical reception if they had the courage to speak up and ask their questions.

Some faithful members dismissed their concerns as lies, or as coming from anti-Mormon sources.  Some of their fellow LDS members, including friends and family accused them of being influenced by Satan.   Their fellow LDS members and family even questioned their righteousness and their motivations.   Many of those in this study were met with in some cases harshly critical and judgmental reaction to their sincere questions.  Spouses threatened divorce and in some cases of the 158, even followed through with it.  
Still a large group of others were so afraid of the above reactions, so afraid of jeopardizing their marriages, and friendships, and even personal standing within the ward that they were just too afraid to ask questions of their trusted LDS friends and Priesthood leaders and even their spouses.  Given that invisible wall of fear that confronted them, some suffered greatly alone and in silence.  Depression and thoughts of suicide were not uncommon.   Others found websites online such as StayLDS.Com, where they felt they could talk about their concerns and questions openly without being judged.    For those who do not know, StayLDS.com is a website devoted to providing a place of support for members who are struggling with history, doctrine, culture of the Church but who wish to remain LDS.

In summation, they learn history that does not match the current image of history we have been taught. Including things that challenge our current understanding of the foundations of the Church.   Many of them feel like there is a cover up and become emotionally affected with feelings of betrayal and anger.  They learn that scholars who have published these things were excommunicated, not for publishing lies, but for publishing facts of LDS history that could challenge someone’s testimony.  As they seek answers from local LDS friends, family and priesthood leaders, their reception is critical and judgmental.  They find that their own righteousness and motives questioned.   And so, feeling unwelcome by their fellow members and leaders, and feeling attacked for their own pursuit of truth, feeling that the church is hiding its history and punishing those who are revealing it and then not having the same integrity it demands of its members…they leave.  
A final nail in the coffin for some of them is the Church’s own all or nothing approach when it comes to accepting the Church.   For example, some of the things they learned challenged their understanding of the First Vision and the Book of Mormon. Yet, in spite of that, many of them loved the teachings of the Book of Mormon; some of them still accepted Joseph Smith as a prophet.  Even though their understandings of the Book of Mormon and First Vision had now changed.   Yet, because of all-or-nothing proclamations of Church leaders and a cultural tendency to view everything as black and white, they end up feeling like they have to reject the entire Church.    

"I am suggesting that we make exactly that same kind of do-or-die, bold assertion about the restoration of the gospel of Jesus Christ and the divine origins of the Book of Mormon. We have to. Reason and rightness require it. Accept Joseph Smith as a prophet and the book as the miraculously revealed and revered word of the Lord it is or else consign both man and book to Hades for the devastating deception of it all, but let’s not have any bizarre middle ground about the wonderful contours of a young boy’s imagination or his remarkable facility for turning a literary phrase. That is an unacceptable position to take—morally, literarily, historically, or theologically."
- Apostle Jeffrey R. Holland, “True or False,” New Era, June 1995, Page 64 (Excerpted from a CES Symposium address given at Brigham Young University on August 9, 1994.)


Our whole strength rests on the validity of that vision. It either occurred or it did not occur. If it did not, then this work is a fraud. If it did, then it is the most important and wonderful work under the heavens. It's either true or false. If it's false, we're engaged in a great fraud. If it's true, it's the most important thing in the world. Now, that's the whole picture. It is either right or wrong, true or false, fraudulent or true. And that's exactly where we stand, with a conviction in our hearts that it is true: that Joseph went into the Grove; that he saw the Father and the Son; that he talked with them; that Moroni came; that the Book of Mormon was translated from the plates; that the priesthood was restored by those who held it anciently. That's our claim. That's where we stand, and that's where we fall, if we fall. But we don't. We just stand secure in that faith."

- Prophet Gordon B. Hinckley, Interview "The Mormons"; PBS Documentary, April 2007

Given such a black and white, either/or type of choice by the leaders of the Church themselves, and often by many of their fellow LDS members and family and thus having no room for any middle ground some ended up rejecting it all, even though they might love many other aspects and teachings of the Church.
Never mind that they love the culture of the church, never mind that they might agree with most of the doctrines of the church. Never mind that these people have proven that they were committed to the church and were ready and willing and even desirous to continue serving. The fact that they now view the First Vision and the origins of the Book of Mormon differently, in their minds and as declared by the leaders of the church, leaves them OUT.

WHAT IS BEING HIDDEN?
So what exactly did these devout members find that they say is “hidden” or “covered up”?  What is it that they learning that is challenging even the most devout member of the church? The list is actually quite long, but there are some common themes.   I will mention several here, but there are far more.   For those who would rather not know, now is the time to stop reading.    I will also include links to FAIR for each item.  For those reading this that are unfamiliar with FAIR, here is their mission statement: 

FAIR is dedicated to standing as a witness of Christ and His Restored Church.

Our mission is to address the charges leveled at the doctrines, practices and leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons) with documented responses that are written in an easily understandable style.
I am including links to FAIR for each item I raise to accomplish two purposes. First of all, to validate the truthfulness of facts these devout members are learning about the history of the Church.   The questions these people have are legitimate and grounded in fact.  Second, is to provide the reader with a group of LDS scholars who have been endeavoring to provide faith promoting explanations for these and other issues deemed by many to be difficult or challenging.

So, here we go:
FIRST VISION

There have been several versions of the First Vision written by Joseph.  Much like the several accounts in the New Testament of Christ’s resurrection have details that contradict one another, there are multiple versions of the First Vision that conflict with one another as well.  These versions were all either written or dictated directly by Joseph Smith.  Many of the contradictions are mundane such as whether the First Vision took place in Joseph’s   15th year or 17thyear.  All of these versions were written at least a decade after the First Vision took place.   I know I often get my years messed up when trying to remember when something that happened so long ago.  
But there is one significant apparent contradiction. The first version of the First Vision was written by Joseph Smith in 1832 (the version with which we are familiar with was written in 1838).  In that 1832 version, Joseph does not mention seeing two personages, he mentions only one. There was no grand and glorious proclamation “Joseph this is my beloved Son, Hear him!”  

In addition, in the version we are familiar with (1838), Joseph asks Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ which church he should join and even states that as being his purpose of going into the woods to pray.   In the 1832 version, Joseph notes that he had already come to the conclusion on his own that none of the churches of the world were correct and he did not bother to ask that question of the single personage that appeared to him.  The one personage that did appear to him according to the 1832 version did forgive him of his sins though.  
What also makes this even more challenging for some of these members who mentioned this in their stories is that there is plenty of corroborating information prior to 1835 that give the impression that the First Vision was just not that big a deal and that only one personage was mentioned.    There are plenty of articles in early periodicals of the Church talking about the visit of Moroni and the coming forth of the Book of Mormon, but very very few that mention the First Vision directly and none that mention specifically that he saw TWO personages, God the Father and Jesus Christ.  Go ahead and look at D&C 20 given in 1830.  It mentions the First Vision in passing in verse 5 focusing only on the fact that he received a remission of his sins as Joseph mentioned in his 1832 version of the First Vision.  Much greater emphasis is placed the coming forth of the Book of Mormon (D&C 20:6-12). It gives the impression that the visit of Moroni is of far greater importance than the visit of God the Father and Jesus Christ.

TRANSLATION OF THE BOOK OF MORMON

The gold plates were not directly used at all in the translation of the Book of Mormon. Instead, Joseph Smith translated the Book of Mormon by placing a seer stone inside a hat and then placing his face in the hat so that all light would be obscured.  He would then recite the translation of the Book of Mormon that was revealed to him by looking at the seer stone in the darkness of the hat to a scribe who created the text of the Book of Mormon.  
Link to FAIR: http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Translation/Location_of_the_plates
Note two comments from FAIR on this matter:

Joseph did not need the plates physically present to translate, since the translation was done by inspiration.”

“The very fact that plates existed served a greater purpose, even if they were not directly viewed during the entire translation process.”

Link to FAIR regarding use of stone in hat method:  http://en.fairmormon.org/Mormonism_and_history/Censorship_and_revision/Hiding_the_facts


THE SEER STONES USED MORE OFTEN THAN TAUGHT

Joseph Smith was introduced to his first seer stone even beforethe First Vision.  It belonged to a neighbor.  He used that seer stone to find his first seer stone, which he then used to find a second seer stone. Apparently Joseph found two more seer stones in Nauvoo, bringing to a total of four seer stones.  
In addition to using the seer stones to find other seer stones, prior to the restoration he used seer stones to help people find lost valuable items.  

Ultimately, the location of the Gold Plates in the Hill Cumorah was revealed to Joseph through the seer stone. There is some confusion between the seer stone and the Urim/Thummim and the FAIR article deals with that confusion.  But it also goes on to mention that the use of the stone to translate was not limited to the Book of Mormon.   The Joseph Smith Translation and the Book of Abraham translations were also both begun by using a seer stone.
Link to FAIR: http://en.fairmormon.org/Joseph_Smith/Seer_stones
TRANSLATION OF BOOK OF ABRAHAM

Back in 1960s, eleven fragments from the papyrus that Joseph Smith bought from Dr. Chandler and were used to translate the Book of Abraham were found.  The papyrus was translated and the paper itself has also been dated.   The resulting translation doesn’t come close to the current text of the Book of Abraham and the papyrus dates to centuries after the time that Abraham lived.  Even the facsimiles that we have in the Book of Abraham are on these fragments and the translations of those do not match either.
Link to FAIR: http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Abraham/Joseph_Smith_Papyri/Text

JOSEPH SMITH’S PRACTICE OF POLYANDRY

Just about everyone, member and non-member alike, is well aware of the fact that as a Church we practiced polygamy for about the first 60-70 years of our existence.   In 1890 a manifesto was issued that ceased the practice though it did not repudiate the doctrine.   A lesser known second manifesto was issued in 1904.   A bit lesser known is the extent to which Joseph practiced polygamy himself.  I can’t think of a single Sunday School lesson related to Joseph that even remotely alluded to his own polygamous marriages.  If they spoke of a wife, it was always Emma.  However, sometimes people are surprised to learn that Joseph was married to approximately 33 other women.  But these were not the types of polygamous marriages that we are often taught.  For example, we often talk about one of the reasons for polygamy was the large number of widows.   Well, of Joseph’s 33 marriages only 4 were to widows.  Sometimes we talk about sisters who could not provide for themselves, yet Joseph married 11 women who were still currently married to other men that were supporting them, some even active LDS men who were then sent on missions. There were a number of teenage girls including two who were 14.   There were three sets of sisters and even one mother and daughter combination.   Trying to understand those marriages is hard enough, but then you add on top of that that it appears that Joseph lied to Emma, to the Church, and publicly about his practice of polygamy.  

Link to FAIR on Joseph’s marriages to concurrently married women some whose husbands were active LDS: http://en.fairmormon.org/Joseph_Smith_and_polyandry/Book_chapter

Link to FAIR on many issues related to polygamy, but also discusses the apparent lying by Joseph Smith and other Church leaders that went on in relation to polygamy.   http://www.fairlds.org/authors/smith-gregory/polygamy-prophets-and-prevarication

CHANGES TO SCRIPTURES

Most of my life, I have been aware that there had been changes to the scriptures.  But I never studied them in depth.  I just brushed them off as mostly being grammatical in nature or related to spelling errors.   However, I will mention one of several instances of changes to scripture that were mentioned specifically by the 158 devout members who left the church.
1)      The ”Divining Rod”
Many of us are aware that when Joseph’s revelations where gathered and published, they were put out in a book called the Book of Commandments.   Later editions would change the name of the collection of Joseph’s revelations to the Doctrine and Covenants.  
In D&C 8:6-8 we read the following:  

"Now this is not all thy gift; for you have another gift, which is the gift of Aaron; behold, it has told you many things; Behold, there is no other power, save the power of God, that can cause this gift of Aaron to be with you. Therefore, doubt not, for it is the gift of God; and you shall hold it in your hands, and do marvelous works; and no power shall be able to take it away out of your hands, for it is the work of God"

However, in the Book of Commandments that same passage reads differently.  

Now this is not all, for you have another gift, which is the gift of working with the rod: behold it has told you things: behold there is no other power save God, that can cause this rod of nature, to work in your hands, for it is the work of God

Many of them were surprised to learn of this change.  Some of them felt that Oliver’s gift of using the “divining rod” and Joseph’s use of a seer stone (basically rock in hat method) were covered up to not give the appearance of occultish or magical type elements having anything to do with the early revelations of the Church.   
Link to FAIR:  http://en.fairmormon.org/Doctrine_and_Covenants/Oliver_Cowdery_and_the_%22rod_of_nature%22
TODAY’S WORLD:

Even today, there are examples of what seems to be disinformation provided by the Church.  I will give only one example that was cited by these members who left the church, but there are other examples.  
In a press release issued by the Church, the Church officially tackles the question about whether Latter Day Saints believe that they will get their own planet if they make it to the Celestial Kingdom.   The answer is an emphatic “NO.”

Here is the link to the official newsroom of the church and their answer to that question in a FAQ: http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/mormonism-101#C13

On the other hand, you can go to LDS.ORG and find in Gospel Fundamentals the following quote which appears to directly contradict the press release by the church.  This is in the third paragraph.  

“To be able to live in this part of the celestial kingdom, people must have been married in the temple and must have kept the sacred promises they made in the temple. They will receive everything our Father in Heaven has and will become like Him. They will even be able to have spirit children and make new worlds for them to live on, and do all the things our Father in Heaven has done  (Gospel Fundamentals Chapter 36) found on LDS. ORG. 


REINFORCED BY CHURCH ART
The perception that the Church is attempting to portray a vision of our Church history that is not quite accurate is reinforced by Church Art.   This image, has often been used in lessons in Sunday School. 



This image gives the impression that Joseph is actually using the Gold Plates to translate the Book of Mormon.  We established earlier that even LDS scholars acknowledge that the Gold Plates were not used in the translation of the Book of Mormon.  It gives the impression that the plates were visible to Oliver Cowdery, and yet we know that Oliver did not see the plates until he became one of the Three Witnesses.  And the image completely ignores the documented methodology used by Joseph where he placed a seer stone in a hat, placed his face into the hat so that no light could get in and then received the translation through revelation while in this position.   The following picture would be more historically accurate:


FAIR discusses the historically inaccurate art here:  http://en.fairmormon.org/Mormonism_and_history/Accuracy_of_Church_art
Note, the FAIR scholars agree with the historical inaccuracies of the artwork.  However, in this instance, they lay the blame at the foot of the artist.   Although I must admit that I understand the plight of the artist.   Personally, the first image is exactly how I pictured the Book of Mormon as being translated for many years of my LDS life. If I would have attempted to make a painting of that event, it would have been similar to that.  Apparently,   according to the article in FAIR, the artwork did not go through correlation for clearance and so there are several instances of Church art that have made it into our Sunday School lessons that may be historically inaccurate. 

SO WHAT GIVES?
So…is the church actually intentionally hiding its history? Is there a conscious effort to whitewash and present only an idealized, heroic and pristine vision of our history?  Well, unless you are a general authority involved in decisions regarding the dissemination of materials used to teach members, we can only speculate.   I would not dare to provide my own opinion or conclusion.  But there are multiple explanations that have been offered:

1)      Yes, total cover up:  Many of these devout members came to believe that the Church is intentionally covering up any facts in its history that may challenge the orthodox view.   In addition to the many facts of history that they have learned that do not appear anywhere in correlated teachings, their feeling that there is a cover up is buttressed by the disciplining and excommunicating of scholars who publish this information, as well as teachings by General Authorities who state quite clearly that “not all truths are useful” and encourage teachers to only present a faith promoting view of history.

2)      Clinton-esque control of information:One blogger gave the following opinion regarding the question of whether the church hides its history:

“I don’t think it’s so much about hiding information as it is about controlling how, when, and where the information is presented. I remember that the Clinton Administration in the US talked often about “message control”: unpleasant information was revealed at times when most people would not be paying attention. Often, information would be discussed or “leaked” late on Friday afternoon, as most people don’t pay much attention to the news over the weekend. By Monday, the information would have been covered in the media and discussed on the Sunday talk shows and would have mostly blown over. I think this is how best to understand the way the church presents information.”
http://runtu.wordpress.com/2011/04/27/does-the-lds-church-hide-its-history/

3)      Analogy of Parent/Child communication:  One person put forth an interesting theory in their attempt to understand why so much Church history seemed to be covered up.   He compared it to parents who made plenty of mistakes when they were younger.   As they teach their children right and wrong, they avoid telling their children some of the foibles of their own youth.   Where it made sense to share some of their weaknesses they do.   But in many cases, they might never share some of the skeletons in their closet or perhaps the reasoning for some of their choices in life.   Sort of like Jean Valjean who up until his death hid from Cosette the fact that he was a prisoner who had broken parole.  The child then grows up and wants to know and sometimes even gets upset that their parents never told them.  Every parent has their reasons for not sharing some of their own weaknesses with their children, but as was pointed out by the person who developed this theory, somewhere along the line the child grows up.   The feeling they had was that the Church is still treating its members like children, only giving them milk and never progressing beyond that.       

4)      Hidden versus hiding: Another theory espoused by several of these devout members who had chosen to leave the church is much more charitable than the previous three.  In this theory, they see the Church as supremely focused on building faith. As a consequence,  all of the materials and lessons it prepares have that singular focus in mind.  With that objective in mind, the other stuff falls by the wayside.  Not because the Church wants to avoid it, but rather the objective of the lessons is to build faith and have spiritual experiences rather than to delve deeply into an academic debate on history.   And so, since that material is never included in any correlated lesson, it is easy for a member focused on his callings, reading the scriptures daily and focused on the lessons manuals never comes across any of these other issues and is completely unaware of them.   The controversial material is not being covered up by the church, but rather is just “hidden” or in other words just hard to find since it is not being proactively included in lesson materials.   You have to be engaged in specific research to find it.   If you look for it, it will be there…not hidden away.



5)      NO…The items found are false and all lies perpetrated by Satan or Anti-Mormons.   This theory is most often used by many active members of the Church in response to queries from questioning members learning about these facts of history.   Especially if they have never heard of the point being raised.

Information not conclusion

It is not my intent to come to a conclusion here or even to provide my own opinion on the feelings these members who left the Church have that the Church is whitewashing history.    Rather it is my intent to inform on reasons why these devout members of the church are leaving the church after years and decades of faithful service and commitment.  This blog post just touches on one of the many reasons cited by many who leave the church.  Quite simply, they feel that the church has lied to them.  The beautifully polished, idealized and heroic image of Church history doesn’t turn out to be what they expected.  The history of our church is more complex than what they’ve learned and there are apparently outright contradictions that directly challenge our understanding of the foundations of the Church. 
There is so much material out there to wade through, but this is normal when studying history.   It is part of what makes studying history so fascinating for some and overwhelming for others.  Given the technology of the internet and social media, that information is now more readily available to more and more members. It is being more quickly and easily disseminated.   It is only a matter of time before most if not all members get presented with this information in one form or another.  How we each react to what we learn is personal.  For example, the fact that in 1832 Joseph Smith wrote that only one heavenly personage appeared to him in that famous grove is not in and of itself anti-Mormon.  Yet it is a fact that that is how Joseph recounts that vision the first known time he writes about it.   What you personally do with that fact (and all the others) is up to you.   Some left over these issues (and especially how others reacted to them as they asked questions); other remained with their testimonies strengthened after deep research and prayer.  Certainly the writers at FAIR are well aware of these issues and yet continue as strong members of the Church

However,   we as members can make a big difference if rather than go on the attack and get defensive when these issues are raised by our questioning brothers and sisters that we humbly realize that there are legitimate questions that touch the foundations of the Church.  We can attempt to learn of them ourselves, and get our own answers to provide or at least point them in a direction where they can find help and support.   That direction should include an arrow pointing upwards in prayer in addition to people or other resources that are more aware of these things.  
We should remember that these devout members left the Church not so much because of what they learned, although certainly it shocked them and affected them, even leaving some of them angry and feeling betrayed.  Ultimately it was all of these things combined:  The “hidden facts” they were learning that contradicted long established foundational stories, the punishment of scholars who have published them, the critical reactions from fellow members and families as they began to ask question, the all or nothing mentality of the Church, the perceived hypocrisy of the Church as it demands full disclosure from its members, but from their view does not do so itself.    Given that all or nothing mentality in the church.  Once their paradigm of the BOM and the First Vision was seriously challenged and even changed, many of them could no longer be LDS even though they loved and accepted so much else about the Church.  Many of them stated that it was a matter of personal integrity for them.  

I would encourage us as members to become more familiar with our own church history so that these things do not take us by surprise and so that we do not ignorantly condemn others for raising them.  I would encourage us all not to be so quick to condemn those who are raising sincere questions in an attempt to understand what they are finding.   And perhaps with a more Christlike response, with greater understanding and empathy for our fellow members who might struggle with these things and without fear of the truth, perhaps we can help one or more of other devout members who are considering leaving the Church to stay a little while longer.  

~ Bruce Fey