I have recently seen the following article being
shared on various social media: When
Doubts and Questions Arise in the
March 2015 Ensign. This topic has been
a frequent one in the Mormon Church over the last few years with the recent admission that the
Church is in the greatest period of apostasy since the days of Kirtland. More and more talks have been devoted to
this and related subjects in recent General Conferences. The Church has
recently released several essays dealing with some of the topics that have led
some to doubt and question. The Church
has recently excommunicated several high profile people and many lesser known
individuals for their public expression of doubt. It is clear that the LDS Church is at war with doubt in the Church. Undoubtedly,
the numbers of people leaving the Church with unresolved doubts and questions
is significant enough that its leaders have felt the need to address it often
and in some case with very strong language.
The article suggests that the difference between a
questioner and a doubter is obedience. The author, Adam Kotter, states that “A sincere questioner continues to be obedient
while searching for answers” Mr. Kotter then goes on to point out what he believes is
its opposite: “…when people doubt their
beliefs, they often suspend their commitments while waiting for answers. The
doubter’s posture is generally to withhold obedience or limit it, pending
resolution of doubts”
The above statement is printed in an LDS Church publication that is
taken by some to be almost scripture. It is a publication that has its contents
shared regularly with its many members by trusted home teachers. Many devout LDS families read
diligently from the Ensign in their weekly Family Home Evenings. The
article was approved by the Church for publication in this article and thus it
tacitly agrees with this view. This is how the Mormon Church views doubters and how it
wants its members to view doubters: As people who want to be disobedient and
modern day Korihors who are asking for a sign.
I COMPLETELY REJECT THAT PREMISE
The article builds
harmful walls, equating doubters with sinners and the disobedient. Just
because one has doubts, does not mean that they are automatically going to
disobey. I categorically reject that premise. If anything, I have learned that for most of those who begin to have doubts in the LDS Church, that their initial reaction is more often to
INCREASE their obedience in an attempt to get answers precisely because they
have been taught by the LDS Church that there is a correlation between worthiness,
obedience and answers to prayers.
If anything, especially in the early phases of such doubt, doubters are
MORE obedient than those who do not question.
They are taking increased care and watchfulness that
they are doing all that is expected of them in their quest for answers. They ensure that their tithing is paid, that they are praying regularly, reading
scriptures regularly, going to the Temple, holding family home evenings, keeping commandments and covenants and
not even remotely considering buying a Coke.
And yet, as they increase their obedience, they are met
with accusations for daring to explore those questions. Some get turned in to their Bishops for daring to question and seek answers openly and with integrity. For the sake of sheer honesty, clarity and
transparency, I would suggest the Church redefine what it means by a “sincere
question.” A sincere question is one
that will lead you to believe that the Church is true. All other questions are doubts and could not
possibly be sincere. Expressing any one
of them is a sin and a sign of disobedience.
John 20:24-29 we find the story of Thomas the
Apostle. He is perhaps the most famous doubter
of all. He expresses his doubt
openly. How did Jesus handle his
doubt? Did he condemn him for being
disobedient? No, he answered his
questions!
Matthew 28:17 We learn that even some of the remaining
apostles still doubted even after knowing he was resurrected. Christ responds to them and the Bible goes on to record their zeal in their missionary efforts after that visit.
Acts 10:17 Peter is doubting a vision he had, and then
the marvelous story of Cornelius unfolds addressing his very doubts and increasing his power and faith.
In every case, these people are not condemned for their
doubts, they are not accused of being disobedient, instead, they found answers, they found reason for faith.
Will the author of this article have the temerity to suggest
that Peter was disobedient, that some of the Eleven were sinners and that Thomas was the
equivalent of Korihor? Shall they too be excommunicated for publicly expressing
their doubt in a place no less visible than the scriptures themselves?
A doubt IS when sincere question becomes more than a
simple question. Initial indications are
troubling and raises the motivation to know. And so it becomes a quest for truth. I wrote about this in my blog
post “Doubting does not make you an apostate”
Also let us be clear on the object of doubt. The leaders of the LDS Church are attempting
to equate doubt in the LDS Church with doubt in God and Christ. Indeed, the many scriptures cited enjoining
one not to doubt are telling you to not doubt Christ and to not doubt God. Active LDS members that find themselves doubting
are often not doubting God or Christ.
Rather, they are doubting the foundational claims of the institutional
LDS Church. The LDS Church is not God.
The article goes on to explore the connection, well known
by members of the Church, between worthiness and answers to prayers. If you are not getting answers to your
prayers and to your questions, then according to the article, the initial
reaction should be to look inward and ask “Lord, is it I?” A principle of LDS Faith is that answers do
not come to the disobedient. The problem
with that premise is that then no one should ever receive an answer, for we
have all sinned in one way or another. This
leads to an unhealthy destruction of the self.
As answers continue to elude the questions begin: Where else have I been unworthy? A downward spiral begins where truly good and
wonderful people suffer great depression and in some cases consider, attempt or
sadly even succeed at suicide as their doubts in the Church increase and they are met with wall after wall in their quest to find answers.
It is not the doubt itself that creates the depression and leads to suicide. But rather, the reaction of the Church and
its members to those who doubt. Making doubters feel as not worthy, casting them out as sinners and disobedient exactly as this article suggests.
Is it any
wonder that many active LDS members who begin to doubt, are filled with fear
at raising those doubts? The scriptures teach us that “perfect love casteth out
fear” 1 John 4:18 yet there is no perfect love for those who
doubt in the Church. Instead there is nothing but fear. Lots of it. Fear that leads to divorce, to ostracism and sometimes excommunication. In not a single
instance in scripture, is there fear of doubt, in each case when Christ was
faced with a doubter, he embraced them and gave them a reason to have faith.
Sadly, the author of this article is still not finished with
condemning doubters. He seems a doubter
as someone who is “…talking yourself into answers you want to believe rather
than receiving true answers from God”
TO A MAN AND WOMAN, of the hundreds I know who have left
the Church, and the hundreds of additional stories I have read of those who
left the Church. Every single one of these people WANTED the Church to be true. The answers they wanted were ones that validated for them that the LDS Church was true, which was their starting point. No one talks themselves into it
a disbelief of the Church. Rather, they start off aggressively attacking those
doubts and assuming them to be false. And as their doubts rose, they kept trying to talk themselves into an answer that supported the Church. LDS leaders completely fail to either recognize or acknowledge this.
The final insult is that the author implies that those
who doubt are not willing to do what it takes to get an answer. Are doubters willing to do what it
takes? YES…a thousand times yes. If a general authority believes that those
who have left the Church have not prayed diligently, inquired diligently,
fasted, went to the temple, magnified their callings with greater diligence,
and attempted in all ways to be more obedient in their quest for truth…then he
does not know his people and has no hope of offering them any help. Instead, he
does exactly as this article does…alienates them even further and accelerates their
exit from the Church.
I just read the article last night with my wife. I agree that it does certainly imply that all those who doubt are using those doubts as justification for sin and transgression, but it doesn't outright say it. It just warns against it.
ReplyDeleteFor me the big issue is that it implies that no amount of doubt in the veracity of the church's claims justifies abandoning adherence to the practices of the religion. This may be accurate if the church were true, but that's exactly the question, isn't it? This position immediately dismisses all concerns with the church's truth claims as baseless.
However, the author would not likely be willing to apply the same standards to doubting Muslims or Catholics. If they were to speak with LDS missionaries and begin to doubt core tenets of the faith they were raised in, would the church recommend they "keep their covenants" and remain obedient to the tenets of Islam/Catholicism? No. After all, that would keep those people from joining the "true" church. Any advice given to doubters that applies equally well to the followers of any religion is worse than useless.
Pascal's Wager, a similar argument, states that obedience in doubt has greater potential payoffs than disobedience, so one should act as if the church is true. It has the same problem: it presumes that there is only one choice. In reality, we are surrounded by countless potentially true religions. We do not have time to test them all by walking in obedience to their precepts for indeterminate periods of time. We can, however, use reason to swiftly eliminate demonstrably false religions. This article seeks to undermine that method, and further state that no time period of obedience is enough. It doesn't matter how long you lived, served, and worshipped - if you have doubts, you need to remain obedient and wait for an answer which may never come in this life.
Thank you for writing my experience. Amen.
ReplyDeleteThank you for writing my experience. Amen.
ReplyDelete