The word “Anti-Mormon” has dogged me ever since my first
serious questions and doubts about the Church claims of truth, the version of
history the Church taught, and some elements of LDS culture began weighing upon
me years ago. I began studying in
earnest and ran smack into the Anti-Mormon wall.
I was afraid of that word. I was afraid that I might become a victim of
so-called Anti-Mormon people, Anti-Mormon literature and Anti-Mormon
websites. I was afraid that what I
found and what I was learning were somehow coming from “Anti-Mormon”
sources. Back then, I thought that just
about anything that came from an “Anti-Mormon” source had to be a lie. Yet, time after time, I would confirm facts that I was sure were
“Anti-Mormon” lies. That confirmation
would come from Church sources. Things that I knew to be true after confirming them from Church sources I was being told by fellow members that they were lies and untrue. Trust began to be shaken. While debate rages over the many interpretations of facts both pro/anti and
every shade in between, the facts themselves remained stubborn. You either struggle to account for them, or
you choose to ignore them.
Many of us, who for most of our lives had so much faith in
the Church, and incredible faith in a God who would answer prayers impacting
eternal salvation much like he had for Joseph Smith, find it difficult to
ignore difficult questions and difficult to believe that God would help us find
our keys, but not help us resolve an issue that had an impact on our
testimonies. We were not afraid to
confront them. I was one who was sure
that the issues raised would turn out to be either Anti-Mormon lies, or that some
perfectly logical explanation existed, or perhaps that some fact that I was
missing would be found. Ultimately, given
that I was searching with a sincere heart and real intent, that God would
answer a specific prayer about the specific topic being researched.
The more I learned about issues that for some reason were
not found in any manual, I sought out people to discuss it. Did they know about this? Did they have any insights? Was I living in a hole? What were their thoughts? Could they point me to a source that I was
unaware of?
At first I turned to my wife. I was hit with an immediate threat. Everything I read was from Satan, if I left
the Church, she would divorce me, she told me to get my head out of the
Anti-Mormon world. She did not believe that I had confirmed the issues as legitimate questions from Church sources. Nor did she care to see that
for herself. Talking to her about this created enough strife in our marriage that we could not talk about it anymore.
I next turned to my Bishop.
He thought the questions were interesting, but he did not want to
discuss them. He thought he might look
them up after he was released. But his
focus had to be on building faith…He suggested that I ignore it all.
These were questions that I dared not raise during a Sunday
School Class, or Priesthood. There was
no opportunity to do so, since none of the lessons ever addressed any of the
questions that I had. I also felt that
raising them in Church would detract from the Spirit and purpose of the
meeting. SO I kept silent about them in
Church. There just seemed to be nowhere
to go to discuss these things.
I took to social media, mainly Facebook. I had a much wider group of LDS friends
online…not just those I ran into in my ward or stake, but LDS friends from my
mission, from the ward I grew up in, my young single adult wards, and so
on. Surely, someone out there would know
something I did not. I talked to my LDS
friends because I trusted them and because I did not want to talk with the so
called Anti-Mormons about my questions.
And of course, members tell you to avoid talking to them, so I did.
The reaction was interesting. Some certainly did join in on the discussions. I learned a lot from them and I truly
enjoyed the back and forth that inevitably occurs when many different people
engage. . It was great to get a wide variety of views. I soon realized that many were watching my
discussions online without participating.
Some of them wrote to me directly and privately, thanking me for asking questions
they had but never had the courage to ask.
I had more support than I thought.
I started gaining followers as people heard I was openly discussing more
difficult questions on my Facebook page.
I did not seek out these followers, they just came on their own.
But then the criticisms began. At first they were gentle, warning me that
some people had weaker testimonies and could be impacted by our discussions
negatively. Some began to wonder if I
were out to discredit the Church. Some
wrote to me directly, asking me to stop or asking me to continue the discussion
somewhere more private. And of course,
someone “out of concern” reported my activity to the Bishop.
In deference to those who were worried that I was impacting
people’s testimonies, I created my first Facebook group. A place reserved only for those who were
interested in discussing Mormonism and unafraid to examine closely each of the
issues. The group was a closed
group. No way that anyone who did not
want to engage in those discussions would see it. But that was not enough. It wasn't long before I was accused of setting up an Anti-Mormon group in an attempt to persuade all my friends the Church was wrong.
I also started blogging about what I was learning , what I
was feeling and what I was observing. It
was just a place to capture my thoughts, record them for later review. I would share the blog with others so
I could get their reactions… Was I right? Was I wrong? Was I missing
something? Was there a better way of
looking at things? I just placed it out
there. I did not encourage anyone to
read it. I really did not care if anyone read
it. But I certainly did welcome any and
all reactions from anyone who did.
Once again, I was reported to the Bishop. More and more people became convinced that I
was on some type of vendetta against the Church, attempting to undermine the
faith of others. All I was trying to do
was to shore up my own faith which by this time had begun to falter.
The Bishop talked with me in his office and he directly asked me to stop
writing about the Church? What??!! I could not believe what he asked. I grew up loving the LDS doctrine regarding the
fight for Free Agency led by Christ and Michael in the pre-existence. I felt that that such a fight was my
fight. Yet here was my Bishop asking me
to no longer write or discuss what I was learning. It felt more like the Bishop was embracing
Satan’s plan who would make sure everyone was saved by enforcing conformity, by
taking away free agency and by extension, the right to question. I asked him point blank “Are you trying to
muzzle me?” That took him aback. My Bishop is a good man and was a good
friend. I don’t think he honestly
recognized that he was doing precisely that.
He backtracked and emphatically said no, but was unable to say more.
Why are people who ask difficult and perhaps critical questions
in a sincere search for truth made to feel like pariahs in the Church? For many devout members, their definition of “sincere
questions with real intent” are only those that lead to a testimony of the
Church. All other questions are
perceived as an intentional attempt to undermine the Church.
I have since been called many names that go along with being
an Anti-Mormon. I am also a Church
hater, a follower of Satan, one of Satan’s minions. I have denied Christ and have crucified him anew. I am one of the elect who has been
deceived. I have been accused of intentionally
attempting to lead children of other members astray. I’ve been told that I am on an Anti-Mormon
tirade and that I am campaigning to get people to leave the Church. I have been compared to Judas and someone
who would be among the crucifiers of Christ.
Need I say more? Why would I want
to be a part of people who think that of me?
If anything, those accusations have raised resentment and in
some cases, anger, in many people like me.
We were just seeking answers to very hard questions, questions that were
disturbing to us and were disturbing to our understanding of LDS claims of
truth. We took those questions to our
LDS fellowship in good faith seeking support and direction. Instead, we get accused of attempting to
undermine the Church and lead others astray.
We have been rebuffed. I am not
surprised that many of my friends who have experienced this have become angry
and resentful as to how they were treated by some members. I totally understand why some of them indeed
have become “Anti-Mormons” To be sure,
there are definitely people who are Anti-Mormon and proud of it. Zelph on the shelf has a great article
entitled: "Why I'm proud to be an Anti-Mormon" describing their own feelings on
this similar topic. http://zelphontheshelf.com/why-im-proud-to-be-anti-mormon/
But what is an Anti-Mormon? Perhaps I am in some denial
protesting against being labeled an Anti-Mormon when I really might be. I
asked a bunch of my devout LDS friends on how they defined an Anti-Mormon. Four clear themes arose from their answers.
1)
An Anti-Mormon is someone who was a strong
emotion/feeling of hatred towards the Church and/or its members.
2)
An Anti -Mormon is someone who is actively and
intentionally trying to persuade others that the LDS Church is not true.
3)
An Anti-Mormon is someone who is actively and
intentionally trying to undermine confidence in the leaders of the Church
4)
An Anti-Mormon is someone who is actively and
intentionally attempting to undermine the credibility of the LDS Church as a
religious organization.
Using the above four points as a definition of an
Anti-Mormon, here are my reactions:
1)
I do not hate the Church. To hate the Church would be to hate
myself. I was raised and grew up a
Mormon by a single Mother who was a convert.
The ward I grew up in was amazing and they were a huge support to my
mother and sisters and I. I loved my
mission and do not regret serving one. I
am proud of the LDS ancestry that all LDS members inherit. What the pioneers accomplished was incredible
in the midst of the hardships they endured should bring the admiration of
anyone. I do not hate any church members either. The ones that I know are all good people
striving hard to follow the Prophet and follow Christ as best as they can. Those who have been antagonistic towards me
have truly been a minority of the members that I personally know, but with
enough motivation in them to silence me that thanks to their playing Big
Brother and turning me in to my Bishop and later having members of the Stake
Presidency watching whatever I said or wrote.
Like it or not, I will always be a Mormon and I still have a great love for all of my LDS friends and family. I still to this day defend the Church to those who are viewing some aspect of it incorrectly.
2)
I have no intention or desire to convince anyone
else that the LDS Church is not true. I
have come to my own conclusions, but those are my own. Everyone is free to seek their own answers
to life’s great questions. But that doesn’t
mean that I will stop writing or thinking about the Church either. I want to know what LDS members think of the
issues that face them today and that are more and more making it into
mainstream media for millions of non-Mormons to digest as well. Woiuldn't they rather have their voice heard as a response than those of people who hate them? If I wanted to destroy a members testimony,
I would actively and intentionally push the CES letter on my devout LDS
friends, I would continually attack the historicity of the Book of Mormon, I
would attack other foundational aspects of the claims of the
church. I would do so openly and
publicly. But I do not. I probably post more positive articles about
the Church than negative ones. On the
other hand, if anyone asks me, I will answer any question about the Church
honestly. If someone asks me, I will
explain why I left the Church. The path
of someone questioning the Church is a hard and lonely one. I traveled it. I would not want anyone to do that
alone. So I will always be there to help someone on that path. They do not have to agree with
me. I’m fine with that. But I will be a place where any one can ask
me anything, explore their thoughts and feelings and I will do my best to respond and be fair
3)
I have no intention of undermining any current
leader of the Church. I may disagree
with them, I may point out contradictions or inaccuracies. But since when did the “rules” change so that
any disagreement with a Church leader is viewed as an attempt to undermine them
and dismiss their credibility? How many
of us have had moments of serious disagreement with our parents? Yet in those disagreements and times of criticism, do we not still love them? Do we not not think they are a very credible influence in our
lives? We do not attempt to smear their names publicly.
4)
I have no intention of undermining the Church
itself. Once again, I do disagree with
the Church, but honestly, I am just one small person. A Church with millions of active members around the world that is as powerful and rich as the LDS
Church, with billions of dollars of assets at their control, a top leadership that
is filled with people with Harvard MBA’s, Law Degrees and PhD's as worldly proofs
of their brilliance, such a church is hardly threatened by someone like me. If they were, it would be akin to straining at
a gnat.
I may no longer believe in the historicity claims of the
Book of Mormon, I may no longer agree with the general principles and doctrines
of the foundation of the Church and how that was taught. I may no longer view Joseph Smith as a
prophet. I may still want to discuss
openly my thoughts, feelings and things that I learn about the Church with
other members to get their views. I may
still want to see what members of the Church think about the issues that of the
day that are facing them and getting lots of press.
But I am NOT an Anti-Mormon.
Well said. I think you captured something felt by a lot of people, but difficult to express. Thank you for writing this and for writing it so well.
ReplyDeleteThere is absolutely nothing wrong with asking questions or investigating the Church's history, doctrine or practices, Elder Ballard said. He advised Church leaders to help those who come to them with difficult questions. “When someone comes to you with a question or concern, please don't brush the question off — do not tell him or her to not worry about the question. Please do not doubt the person's dedication to the Lord's work. Instead, help the person find the answers to their questions.”
ReplyDeleteThis is what your experience should have been. I am sorry that it was not.